So first up was Chablis 2008 from Vincent Dampt, I buy Vincent's
wines and give then 2-5 years before drinking so I am on the "basic"
2008 at the moment, deliciously mineral but nicely evolved enough now with that
all important Chablis texture, great stuff on the harbour wall after the long
drive there. To follow the Chablis and with a simple first night supper I dug
out a bottle (for some weird reason there was one bottle on the system at work)
of Gevrey-Chambertin 1er Cru Petit Chapelle 2006 Rossignol-Trapet. These
guys have been on a real charge from about 2005 onwards and I thought this
would be fascinating to try. No decanting - I don't "do" decanting
with red Burgs - it was enjoyable from the off, the oak a little marked on the
nose, this quite masculine and defo needs 3-5 years to be at a really balanced
place, good fruit there, in a more black and creamy way...quite serious.
On the evening of Day 3 we were very lucky to be going to Llys
Meddyg (http://www.llysmeddyg.com/)
as Cynan, Fran's (my better half) Cousin and an up and coming author plus
part-time wineman, had organised for us to have a specially assembled tasting
menu. This is an idilic spot (I have no vested interest) and strongly recommend
you search it out if you are down Pembroke way. Ed and Lou Sykes have got a
great chef and a lovely relaxed set up. The meal itself was great, pictures
don't do it justice, with smoked duck followed by pigeon, followed by smoked
salmon with amazing beetroot (they do a lot of smoking - the duck and the
salmon themselves) then Lamb and finally a brilliant light pudding of
Gorseflower Panacotta amongst over things. I wasn't making detailed notes
otherwise I'd say what we had with what but we were all chatting away so I'll
just go through the wines. Pre-dinner we had a Tasmanian sparkler Jansz
2005 (which reminds me that we had the Jansz NV the day of the Chablis and
Gevrey) it was very good, balanced, more mellow but richer than the NV. I would
say though on balance I think the NV was the more complete wine. To start the
meal we had a trio of Egon Muller Estate Rieslings - 2010, 2009 & 2007
- we drank them in that order. If I had to rank them in quality order I would
go 2010 (fresh, brisk and complex), 2007 (very balanced, only a dash of
development, try complete) then 2009 (still very good just less exciting than
10 or 07). They went very well with the food. I increasingly think that
Riesling (especially at Kabinett type level) is the best food friendly white
wine going. Once the food got a little meatier we move to Barbaresco 2006
& 2007 from Produttori del Barbaresco. There is quite a well documented
little "savvy-buy" fact on the 2006 as they did not release their
single vineyard Barbaresco's and instead but it all into their
"Basic" Barbaresco but this only 100% applies to the magnums, anyway
enough geeky Piedmont info. The 2007 was, as expected more easily accessible as
a wine, softer, lusher more obviously enjoyable. I liked the 2007 but
really loved the 2006 which had feminine fruit with masculine structure.
It needs (they both do) time but was so quintessentially Piedmont and Nebbiolo.
With the Gorseflower Panacotta there was apparently only one wine to have
- Lacrima di Morro, Querci Antica - I'd never had it before, it was very interesting,
amazingly floral you'd swear it was fortified but it wasn't. There was one more
conventional sweet wine to close the evening - Clos Thou 2010 Jurancon -
really fascinating, almost peanut butter but actually has an oily richness,
great, would like this again.
Over the next two nights, amongst other things, I had Guardiola
2009 and 2010 from Andrea Franchetti's Passspisciaro Estate in Sicily. This is
a wine I always buy and I wanted to compare the vintages and the wine at a
different stage. In Sicily they've probably finished the 2011 already but I am
convinced that in the same was as Chablis - Guardiola is also unoaked
Chardonnay - it is best with a couple of years to mellow. The 2009 was
seriously good, melons and ripe limes but with an almost sherbet like texture
that I love. The 2010 was as expected a little more streamlined and focussed
and a little more one dimensional now...I think there is very little between
the vintages in quality but the extra year made for an improvement for me so I
will look to give Guardiola that sort of time in the future. I took a pair of
Margaux 2006's along with me - Kirwan & Giscours - and tried these over
the same two nights. Kirwan was impressive, good balance, classical left bank
Cabernet but not over the top or over-extracted has that Mgx soft charm, it is
no out and out star but is is good and enjoyable. Giscours was decent but no
more to my mind, it had a slightly green side but was charming enough, good
Cabernet but no more than that. I find Bordeaux 2006's (on both banks) to be
"solid" but no more than that, I would rather drink 2001 on both
banks and 2004 on the left bank. The 2006's just remind me of better 2002's. I
know this is not a general view and would welcome any 2006's that people feel
are stars.
Another evening and another pairing. My son (aged 10) with a lot
of help and guidance from Cynan had designed a four course meal. The wines were
a pair of Gruner Veltliner's as described next. Dom Gobelsburg Gruner 2010
Neiderosterreich, pear and cream with grass on the nose then a prickle on
palate, good.
Dom Gobelsburger Lossterrassen Kamptal 2011 delicious very
mineral in a stoney way, more taut than the 10, both delicious but I prefer
this (we left a little of each for the following night and both had improved).
The two reds were both Cote de Nuits 2009 "Lieu Dits" from Giles
Jourdan - La Robignotte & La Montagne - I was hoping they would be
interesting and not overpowered by the 2009 factor. We had them side by side
- La Robignotte, very good indeed has fresh fruit but also real depth and
a good density with out weight, complexity shows too. La Montagne 2009
very decent but without the depth of the La Robignotte, more red fruited and
nervy. I will try both again this time next year. i was left with the impression
both were good but that the La Robignotte is the class act.
Having had a few grey days (this is Wales!!) we went for a great
coastal walk the next day as the sun was out. Along the way I enjoyed a Cohiba
Siglo VI it may have needed to settle a bit more, was good but one dimensional,
I have a couple more so will give them a couple of years I think. I like Cohiba
but don't buy masses of them and this kind of reassured me that this was a
decent tactic. The last eeving would be used to hoover up any food and also
bottles we have left so another bottle of Chablis Dampt 2008 disappeared but I
had saved one last tasting pairing both Barolo 2006's from a producer I had
been recommended - Guido Porro - the two wines were Vigna Mazzairasco
& Vigna S.Caterina. I wanted to taste these two as I have bought 6 (now 5)
bottles. Barolo Vigna Lazzairasco 06, Guido Porro, very balanced, old
skool (a very good thing) drinking but will improve, red stewed
fruit. Barolo Vigna S.Caterina 06, Guido Porro, very balanced like the
Lazzairasco, not quite drinking a little more structure here. I was impressed
by both and both are very much in the traditional camp. And so to the last
wine of the holiday...Umathum Auslese 2009, Burgenland (Chardonnay/Scheurebe)
really fresh. Lychee, white fruit delicious...
No comments:
Post a Comment